Personal Manifesto on Miracles

Some people don't believe in miracles. Belief in the sense of a cognitive acknowledgment of miracles, not a belief to an institutionalized set of organized practices and rituals. You must know that I believe in miracles, and I tend to discard other people's considerations on this, yeah you Robin Scherbatsky. Although, miracles must be under these circumstances.

1. Miracles must be under the realm of possibility, excluding metaphysical discourses.
    1.1 The realm of possibility includes proved concepts thru scientific pursuit or documented investigative cases.
       1.1.1 Documented investigative cases exclude paranormal evidences, since it invalidates section 1.1

2. Miracles include occurrences above the 0% probability.
    2.1 Section 2 explains that a monkey that typed the name "Lester" on a computer is probable, even how astronomical the values are.
       2.1.1 Events that are deemed as a miracles, on the grounds of high improbability, must be in complete documentation.
       2.1.2 Hearsay evidence for miracles on the grounds of high improbability are invalid.
    2.2 Miracle consideration for personal visual evidence may be valid in your perspective. Propagation of the truth of the miracle may be in the unnecessary value.
       2.2.1 Approval for personal visual evidence is an appeal to the Five Tropes of Agrippa on Relation, where all things change due to the various relations it is entangled with.
       2.2.2 Approval for personal visual evidence, and propagating the truth of the miracle is unnecessary is an appeal to the Regressive Argument of the Munchhausen Trilemma, where current concepts rely on previous concepts, therefore infinitely regressing to prove a point that needs another proof.
       2.2.3 Approval for personal visual evidence, and propagating the truth of the miracle is unnecessary is an appeal to the Axiomatic Argument of the Munchhausen Trilemma, where current concepts rely on the biases of the developers that concocted it.

3. Highly improbable events are not necessarily miracles, other events may be in consideration as facts that are unknown to the public or the speaker.
    3.1 Exclusion from Section 3 is invalidated if the argument is an appeal to ignorance.
       3.1.1 Overall, any fallacious appeals for exclusions are invalidated.

You can adopt this manifesto for yourself, I am not imposing this on you. The higher importance of this list is to attain what the logical positivists are striving, eliminating vagueness and ambiguity in language.